I come to know about your site from my friend and when i came here i come to know that a lot of information waiting for me…..
curt
Nike Air Royal Mid VT on www. nicetick.com/nike-air-royal-mid-vt-blue-molded-leather-club-purple.html
IsWith - Common companies (ComCom and GovComCom)
Show Comments
tags:
It seems you have no tags attached to pages. To attach a tag simply click on the tags button at the bottom of any page.
22 pages:
- ...About your JavaScript...
- Chat
- Collapsible block 9 folded
- ComCom - in its wider context: (still) Own what You share, as bigger is the d and in addition to the have, the want and the can
- ComCom - short Definition
- Comparison
- Distribution Of Powers
- Forum Category
- G1 Body
- Howto Use The This Page
- Introduction To Iswith
- Iswith Service Etc
- IsWith - the Company and the Netwroking
- Latest Comments
- List All Pages
- Manage Site
- Out Links
- Recent Forum Posts
- Short Descriptions
- The 4 initial groups in the networking
- Unique Factors
- Using This Doc
| <-- |
Hidden
| Category name | Threads | Posts | Last post |
This category groups discussions related to particular pages within this site. | 95 | 14 | by 11 Apr 2011 07:45Jump! |
this is for the user adding content and activity to this site. please ask for and let other now what you would like to have here and if you have any question about how to edit your page etc, please let us help you, thanks. | 0 | 0 | |
Deleted forum discussions should go here. | 0 | 0 |
RSS: New threads | New posts
Search is temporarily unavailable, we are working to bring it online!
Add to this wiki
Edit | Code | Tag | Commentsn/show Forum {$permit_forum} can create
Contact {$permit_chat} can create | Wiki {$permit_wiki} can create | Blog Any wikidot.com user can create | Doc Any member can create
| July 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Next | General Anyone can create | How |
Constitution of its Citizens
Against corruption, let's now make it !!!
Contributions last month: 0
Contributors: 1
Contributors: 1
Rcoin - coin of Respect! @ postnational solutions
Communal, Time Limited and Equally Re-distributed
Contributions last month: 0
Contributors: 9
Contributors: 9
Yes, I am angry! @ Postnational Solutions
Solutions by Common Companies Foundation of NonProft Netowrk
Contributions last month: 0
Contributors: 2
Contributors: 2
Postnational Solutions To Win the Xenophobic Neoliberalism WithOut the Tyranny of Minority/Majority (by ComComIst) #HopeIsBack
Building Bottom-Up, Self Organized, Responsive, Scalable and Collective Inclusive Growth Solutions #InclusiveGrowth
Contributions last month: 0
Contributors: 6
Contributors: 6
Gentrification Resistant HowTo @ Postnational Solutions
Get Organized AS Peer Owners
Contributions last month: 0
Contributors: 1
Contributors: 1
Common Companies/Companions: ComComized @ Postnational Solutions
Contributions last month: 0
Contributors: 1
Contributors: 1
Blog ComComism ( for Common Companies) @ Postnational Solutions
Public Blog of ComComism for any ComComist
Contributions last month: 0
Contributors: 7
Contributors: 7
ComComized Groups:
Full mobility while blocking unlimited power accumulation for transparent and satisfaction of the members
Contributions last month: 0
Contributors: 7
Contributors: 7
common companies consultants @ Postnational Solutions
Contributions last month: 0
Contributors: 1
Contributors: 1
Latest pages in this site:
contact
Included page "main:contact" does not exist (create it now)
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Fe-Male, der männlich-weiblich-Effekt
I found - thanks for this big gift.
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Fe-Male, der männlich-weiblich-Effekt
I,
as a female german,
enjoy very much
this beautyful thinking
of you.
Thank you for doing so.
To find an enjoyful solution
together
as fe-and-male,
to come out
of this
seperation/isolation,
because
both,
female- and male-energy
is human-nature,
as wo-and-man.
The conscionousness of it
will bring us
in the direction
of ending
man-woman-fight,
woman-woman-fight,
man-man-fight
and also
open up for
making peace with ourselfs
and
bring it into the world
as a NEWBORN
growing
and
growing up
to a peaceful
ADULD and ELDER,
to continue in
our healing-way
and share
the BEAUTY OF LIVE,
together
in a WORLD WITHOUT WAR.
WITH OUR CHILDREN,
TOGETHER.
LET US CREATE
THIS PEACE-WORLD,
TOGETHER,
whom ever you are,
what ever you are
and
where ever you are.
C O M C O M - THE TIME IS N O W !
AHO - this is my saying. I hear it with my heard.
in discussion ComCom / all about ComCom » obama's brothers/sisters - bankers or you?
Who are obama's brother/sisters over which he is the kipper,? The bankers? Well if they are such wizard who could make 12 times more for each dollar, why shouldn't they be GovComComized now?
please let obama know about comcom!
It seems that he is now surrounded by such officers who call transparency the act of telling you what they want to tell or sell but without the act of letting you know by letting you ask your questions.
see more here: http://iswith.wikidot.com/govcomcom
me:) + 99occupy + yes i am angry! + yes again we can + pile + comcomist <= namzezam :)
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Fe-Male, der männlich-weiblich-Effekt
Hello,
thanks for recognizing relevancy of the subject.
Well - for answering this question, I have to give you a little backround regarding the structure of the german language. There exist three different articles, one for each male, female and neutral, in both cases, determined as well as undetermined ('the' and 'a'). That is how each mentioning of a person is identified as either male or female. This distinction is continued throughout all the grammar, for pronouns, adjectives etc.
In addition, the female form of any specification of a person (such as e.g. shareholder) is expressed by the suffix 'in', so that a female shareholder would be a shareholderin, which for plural then reaches the form of shareholderinnen.
Now the solutions in use keep grammatical correctness and usually function by ecplicit mentioning of both, the male and the female form, applied in one of several ways, such as e.g.: "shareholder and shareholderin" or "shareholder/in" or "shareholderIn" etc. Of course then, according to the grammar, this duplification has to be continued throughout all the sentence.
The solution, which the translator applied, acts differently. Intentionally it breaks the rules of grammar insofar, that consequently it uses the (male) basic form of the specification (e.g. shareholder), but combined with consequently using the female article and the grammatical female form of the sentence. That is, we talk about a she and her shares, but we do that using the usual and common and simple (and male) form of the person's specification (shareholder).
The advantage is to avoid mutations, such as e.g. Each(m/f) shareholder/in holds his/her shares until his/her membership extends and he/she decides to become a(m/f) member/in., where the concentration is constantly trapped in the slashes. Also, but this is my very subjective feeling, the suffix in always lets me feel like some kind of handicapped person, i am not only an electrician, i am an insisted electricianin, i must get this tail to anything, just to exist. So I found, that happily I can be called an electrician, as long as I am referred to as a she - which is exactly, what I am doing in my way of translation.
The slight irritation, I feel, can be easily overcome, where soon you get used to this form. And how do you (german speaker) feel it?
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Die 6 Punkte, die eine Common Company definieren (wobei t*d=v*c)
i know it is not working well, but i would like to know where it make its mistakes, here are 2 most popular automatic translation of this page:
by babelfish-> go
http://babelfish.altavista.digital.com/babelfish/tr
and put this url http://iswith.wikidot.com/common-company-in-6-points-ger
and then select German to English
please help the non-German here :)
thanks
gtgl
me:) + 99occupy + yes i am angry! + yes again we can + pile + comcomist <= namzezam :)
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » The Focus The Dream And The Problem
me:) + 99occupy + yes i am angry! + yes again we can + pile + comcomist <= namzezam :)
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Fe-Male, der männlich-weiblich-Effekt
hi, well it is getting warmer here, i already like it :)
could you please, let to non-German speaker, as me, to understand your solution for German speakers and to make it with reference to the other-existing such solutions in German.
ps, i do think it is very important issue
me:) + 99occupy + yes i am angry! + yes again we can + pile + comcomist <= namzezam :)
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Fe-Male, der männlich-weiblich-Effekt
Hello Folks
as those of you, who know german, french, italian, espanol, hebrew, arabic etc etc etc may be aware to, the usual form to express, that male and female persons are talked about, is to just use the male form. I don't like it. Me, as a german speaker, am constantly trying to be creative in always new approaches regarding that effect. It is always a 'dance on the wire' between the readability and the flow of the writing at one hand, and the -in my opinion- necessary explicit mentioning of females in some way at the other hand.
In german, there are some -more or less sophisticate- approaches in use by people trying to be pc, but all of which seem in one or the other way poor, miserable, stiff and/or not fun.
Others claim, well, of course we mean also females, what is the fuss about…
Sure. Just, if you are (incidently) a male person, and you symphatize with this claim, just for fun try a little exercise: Replace the male form with the female form in any arbitrary text, read it, and find out if 'of course' you feel meant, too. I am curious about the result, you're welcome to share it at this place…
And you are welcome to share your opinion as well as any other thoughts, ideas, suggestions, critics etc about the subject, considering the german or any other concerned language (english doesn't seem to be so much affected, is that right?)
Looking forward to your feedback and to a developing discussion, which, in the best case, hopefully may even lead to a better solution…
~ Walk in BeautY ~
yes, sorry for the one-more-click effort but this for to save the Googel's PageRank for the content of the site to be exposed better :)
me:) + 99occupy + yes i am angry! + yes again we can + pile + comcomist <= namzezam :)
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » The 6 points defining what a Common Company is (where t*d=v*c or i*d=n*c)
e.g. why shareholder can not be both Common shareholder and Private shareholder (Point 3), why d must be static (Point 2)?
Because these 6 points are for achieving an outstanding standard by which full transparency can be easily get by knowing the d alone, hence the distinction between the 2 portion must be fully clear. This standard must be simple (one factor - the d), if the purpose is decentralization of the market, which is the case for the concept of the ComCom.
me:) + 99occupy + yes i am angry! + yes again we can + pile + comcomist <= namzezam :)
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » ComCom - The Condition, one Example and some notes
When constantly dedicating (1/d-d)*v of all common shareholders
to be held by another common company of which d=1,
for baying private shares at their minimal price reflected from said v,
then the common shareholders can protect the value of v, when baying them by the latter company at the minimal price, if it is to be agreed between the shareholder.
me:) + 99occupy + yes i am angry! + yes again we can + pile + comcomist <= namzezam :)
<\ ok so let's say Alice is a client and Bob is a shareholder
what happens?
/> ok, but not, lets say Alice is private shareholder and Bob is client being common shareholder
<\ ok
/> you need to define what kind of shareholder, more then if the one is client or shareholder
<\ so Bob pays 10 once plus 24 per month?
/> y
so, we need also to define d, lets say d=0.8, that is to say from the total and divednt
bob with the other such common would get only 80%
and Alice with other such private would get 20%
now we can calculate the "membership"
lets say each such as bob pay 24 in cycle
<\ ok
/> also lets say that we have 100 common
and that the company pay for salary etc some expenses , lets say 1000.
<\ ok
/> so we have from membership 2400, minus 1000, left over 1400 to share in dividend, if we do not want to invest that for the future
<\ who's doing the work?
/> those who get payed and/or the members, as in the web 2.0 strategies
<\ ok let's get the whole picture
let's say we make databases for companies
/> ok
<\ we have 100 coders
we have 1000 customers
/> ok
you can do it in 2 ways:
the question is who are we, are we private shareholders? and do we need such, for investment
<\ ok start over
/> so lets say we need some investment we would put d=0.8, for real investor to be private shareholders, and we the coders would be 100 common share holders, we would pay our holding by coding
<\ let's say we make a web browser with smellovision
/> what is smellovision?
<\ you can smell people over the internet
joke
/> fine
so lets define numbers here
say we want 1m investment, we are 100 coder having already the concept
we expect market of ?
… ok lets say market of 100m
so
the privet investors would get , from the market of 100m only 20m whereas each of the common share holder would get 800,000
but that is if we did not expanses,
<\ ok
now
/> now let say the market was here defined per year
<\ what happens with the 10 and 24?
if I don't code I pay 24 a month
but if I code I don't pay anything?
/> moment,
it, how to use the d or the distinction can be played in different ways
in the 1st e.g. we talked about some thing like web 2.0 thing and in the 2nd about hard core developers
you can play it more wide if you would allow 3rd party services as part of the structure
<\ but where is the 10 and the 24?
/> in the 2nd e.g. the 10 is the activity of the common shareholder being the coders, and the 24 is payed by the companies to which we sell the smelling machine
<\ ok so if I code I don't pay and if I don't code I pay?
If I'm the common shareholder?
/> that is in the 2nd, the client is fully distinguished from the company whereas in 1st the client is part of building the company
if the company get income from non common share holder, the company is free from them, those are the clients of the smelling machine
<\ Ok example:
100 people have shares, 50 code, 50 pay 10
/> define common and privet please
also the d
<\ all are common
and .8
how does the share price go up or down?
/> yes it can be, but i do not know if this what you mean
it means that those who pay 10 and those who code are EQUAL
<\ ok
fair enough
/> now it may hold with the payment of membership
<\ membership = cost of service?
/> but if that is so, why not having the coder in the private
membership cost = cost of service+ benfite
<\ benefits?
like
what?
I think I get it
/> of the shareholders , like dividend and holding Intellectual Properties
<\ ok
/> 8-|:P:D
<\ Alice is 100 coders, Bob is 10m buyers, Charlie is 1m investor
/> so
<\ something is odd about it
/> 1st question do we want the buyers to be common shareholders
ok look
<\ let's start with no
buyer is just customer
make it simple then more complex
/> so this is easy have the investor in private and the coder in common, and you are done
<\ how much code = 1 share?
Alice is common and Charlie is private
<\ right
1000 lines of code, 2 months of code?
20 hours per month of maintenance of code?
/> so 0.008 get each coder and0.2 get Charlie
<\ if coder stops coding?
/> from the income, which did not say, did we define the income?
he get!!!
this is so much important in relation to open source
<\ I know
but it has to be reasonable or no one invest as private
/> he gets, he might get less, because other coder gut in where he gut out of coding, but not from common shareholding, that is to say we would have more common share holders
<\ How about this:
/> it is so reasonable, since no gut my invention, because i am not going to code all my life
?
<\ I have an idea
if coder stops coding, he becomes private shareholder
from his coding but no longer has control of code
or something
/> let me say this:
1. no one can be both common and private shareholder
<\ right has to exchange
/> 2. the values might feet to what you suggest but not always
<\ charter of company would state that
there is a way to do this very simple
/> can exchange but not be both, btw you can have common company in one portion and be persnal privte shareholder in the other
so no problem, it depended on the value
it might hold, but the problem is of being scalable
e.g. we begin in d=0.8 and 1M private and 100 coders
being common
now the company gut huge
its total is 1b
no , sorry YOU ARE RIGHT
it holds
because the common would be exchanging for the right proportion
but
<\ someone who pays 10 gets 800,000, someone who pays 1million gets 200,000 something wrong there
/> to summarize, such regulation, we need to granty that the private holder would agree because that one going to loose
it not hold, sorry again
<\ there is a way to do this but it's going to have to be carefully done
/> because the common would evacuate place for other common , but the private would not agree to pay it
<\ ok let's try a different way:
/> look take yourself in the private
as private you are going to pay from your share for nothing to the common one
this cause fraction!!!
<\ yup
after 6 years investor makes profit 200,000 while coder buys a hotel
/> just to add for this case, all the common would benfite from that exachnge
>?<hotel<?!>
<\ small hotel
/> no problem , go on
<\ ok
here's the way to do:
the code is made of modules
/> y?
<\ so we can know the value of the code
/> …
<\ so we know how to exchange
/> but why should we!?
<\ never mind my mistake
/> we could add new common constatly, if the value of the code is such which would alow to build on it
then we say we have 100 coder to BEGIN with , the would make such amount of code, which genrate income
that income sould continue ONLY if more coder would com in
so the income would increse , it would be added
<\ ok
/> now to this flow we add more doprs, more coders
<\ how about this: no common or private
/> more income distinuted between more coders
all are common
<\ code = .8 and money = .2
make it simple that way
or better
/> code is common money is private, but what is the moeny income or out come?
<\ investor gets 20million coder get 800,000
/> so that is what we talked before?
<\ only coder is common there is no money common
because 800,000/10 = 80,000x profit, 20m/1m = 20x profit
investor makes more but spends less
er but common spends less
/> i did not gut the different, please try to use the (my) definition we already established
me:) + 99occupy + yes i am angry! + yes again we can + pile + comcomist <= namzezam :)
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » IsWith - Common companies (ComCom and GovComCom)
Hi, only this page shows its comments but this page as any other page has its thread in the forum of this site and have its bottom, see the discuss(number of comments) and click it for to go to the thread for to find the relevant page see this
Any page you can also rate and in any case: Let the others learn and earn from your learning, please watch the threads ask, replay, post etc.
You can also create pages in this site and after contacting they might be included in this font page.
All about ComCom and/or about how to realize it (how to ComCom it)
is in our need, we must let it out!
last thing add your "new comment" here and replay me
please :)
me:) + 99occupy + yes i am angry! + yes again we can + pile + comcomist <= namzezam :)
Ask namZeZaM
Common Company (ComCom) in 6 points . You can now join the new comcomized.com platform. Why?
Either I am represented in my democratic state and hence what it does is in my responsibility, or I become peer owner in the texture of entities constituting my state.
- The problem: The bigger the group of equal individuals is the weaker is the power of each individual.
- The solution: Each individual owns equal part of the group's assets and evaluates it as a whole when leaving the group. Hence, when such small groups equally own bigger ones, the movement of the individual does not harm the bigger, making the solution scalable.
- more..
- See also http://yes-i-am-angry.wikidot.com
- A "leadership crisis"? A "failed system"? Here is an alternative - A stock market regulation aligned with the following six points to benefit customers, which are "peer owners" over parts of the sellers, which are companies in that market.
Q) What type of legal entity has the comcom to be formed in ?
A) The formation can be in any area between public (stock) company to all types of associations, such as non profit, profit or for-profit associations and includes private ownership or networking of a partnership, when all are based on agreements (personal and / or common) and/or laws and including without any contradiction the six points defining comcom and with these equivalents:
- The business' profit is equivalent to the welfare of the association's members
- The business' owners holdings is equivalent to the maintenance (of services, means and holdings) by members and/or their representatives in the associations,
- The value of holding in business is exchangeable for money and in association to object-coin or peer-coin (which can be bitcoin like).
Q) What exact type of association?
A) e.g: trade association combined with credit union.
Q) From where to start?
A) From the respective of the comcom agreement the process can start from any possible/wished type of body with agreement to bind the bodies together, if not in a partnership of ownership with illegal because of some specific legal mismatch, then at least in (temporary) maintenance authorities over the means (production, service and maintenance) of the body.
Comcomized unit versus cooperative (and in larger scale, states and democracy of the masses)
In short - comcomized unit versus cooperative gives more power to each member and minorities, making comcomizing the units (including comcomizing cooperatives) more important for each member, as larger and heterogenic is the unit. Here are 3 points about it making it better "sound" for the 99%: As a share holder;
- you independently sets the value of your share in your exiting and hence instantly, but with restrained, effecting the price of your executive power and all other members.
- both, your common interest (since the share holding is eqaul) and individual (since it is a share holding) interest, are generated from the same possition of the peer owners;
- You are in winwin position of both: entrance and exit.
Conclusion: This is optionally good for making independent and growing bottom up economic, by having small comcomized units, each being both: peer owner of a bigger comcomized unit and a department in it, as peer-coins evaluate the holding in the small units and as the object-coins evaluate the services or product moving between the departments.
When Co-Ownership is the better choice?
- in becoming stronger customers of organization (while using your boycotting power),
- in becoming stronger members in any large and auth entic organization, or
- politically, in making the bailouts working for the people, by becoming peer owners (equal shareholder) over the assets of the organization.//
This agreement is designed for protecting against been taking over, for allowing competition between groups, benefiting thier individuals, able to migrate between the groups, while becoming stronger versus the groups or versus their executives, because of the common and individual interest given in the peers' postion , which is a winwin postion, in both cases: entry and exit, while always having the power of reflection of satisfaction of the owners, being the masses of the customers being the peer owners (how? search: yes i am angry).
This is for empowering individuals and for providing social strength and practically it can be used for solving both
the cycling of privatization nationalization, such that the government's position would be taking equally by the people claimed to be protected by such government (how? search: govcomcom); and
the credit supernova (- the point of arrival of the dept monetary systems), such that larger such "common companies" allow trading in (and versus) both: "object coins" and "peer coins" of the peer owners in the smaller companies becoming departments in the bigger ones.
The peer coin and object coin as means for trading and evaluating ownership and goods, sometime even without money and hence as non taxable means.
Non taxable ,Why? As long as migration is legal, paying tax is only a choice backing the actions of the taxing authority and its ascendancy! For instance For instance, making the german tax payer to back exporting weapon (and in large scale as being the 3rd largest), exploitation of over sea lands, people and/or corrupt governments and to back the strategy of "too big to fall" discriminating cyprus in the case of luxembourg.
The peer-coin or the object-coin is an accumulative and exchangeable medium, suspending its exchange while holding the trust that it is exchangeable for tangible things in a space governed by agreements between those exchanging the coins and having the trust in the exchange. Sometimes, when the coin is exchangeable only for moderated property, such coin has on itself both symbols, one representing its value and other representing the value's expiration date. Both, the peers-coin and the objects-coin are to be used, when a holding comcom is, or represents, a department in the held comcom, being the governing space of the exchange, as the "departments" are trading across the held comcom (see this picture):
- A) the peers-coin is used for evaluating ownership in the exit/entry of holders of comcom/department and
- B) the objects-coin is used as a fiat money of the held comcom for evaluating (temporal) responsibility/ownership over objects, such as products, services and/or holdings, in the transfer of the objects between holding departments/comcoms.
How to calculate the ratio between object-coin and peer-coin, x-peers-coin and y-objects-coin, x-peers-coin and y-peers-coin or x-objects-coin and y-objects-coin?
- peer-coin evaluates in a one comcom the ownership of one peer owner, where one peer-coin=v=(t/c)*d and t is the total holding value of all the comcom, c is the number of the peers and d is the ratio of the portion held by all the peers.
- object-coin evaluates periodical use of object being products, services and/or holdings, for being use by a caretaker (and not a renter) supplying service of/on/by the object being held directly or indirectly by one "held comcom", where the object is attributed to the caretaker being peer owner of the "held comcom" and a department in the "held comcom".
- practically the peers-coin and objects-coin could be implemented like bitcoin but without mining or with last descendant comcom holding the bitcoin pooled mining and with uid.
When debt money system is a perfect expropriation device, have a tax free option of 2 coin types: 1 of peers & 1 of objects and use them between small & equal common companies holding one bigger, while being its departments.
How to guarantee no multiplication of identities of holder in and across common companies?
In real life, all owners of multiple layers structure of comcoms must be attending together. This can be verified by all being marked on a specific non private part of their body (nose), as they are numbered/nicked-named-uniquely by the mark and as they are marked together in one time lasting less than the time for the marks to disappear - this marking may be done even in different locations. Such marking can also be done by a kind of unique per user device.
Do you agree that clever, honest and authentic politicians should have push for
- GovComCom,
- ComComized stock market and
- tax reduction for any comcom at the rate of 100% times d times "the number of peers" divided by "the number of customers"?
If so, please let them know it ! :)
Tradability is important, Why?
ComComized unit guarantees equality between its peer members being its owners, sitting at its top and owning equal share of it, but why should any such member be able also to trade her/his membership?
- This makes the member becoming more powerfull, while being in a winwin situation - stay in only when is satisfied or go out with a return value. Example: When one sells her/his $10 share only in $9, the executive power of the unit is automatically reduced in 10%, as anyone (out of unit) can see it and hence that power (in the top of the unit) now must care more for the satisfaction of the memebers.
- The satisfaction/desatisfaction of the members is now automatically and directly transparent, as the memebrs are free when are reflecting their evaluation about the acts of the representatives of their organization.
- Compared with cooperatives: comcomized unit is good for its members in huge and heterogeneous society, such society as of being customers, as cooperative is good for the members in small and homogeneous communities, since the cooperative is build upon trust between the members and the power of member in cooperative is reduced with any increase of the number of the members, if only because each human is always limited in the number of other people the one can evaluate for being trusty.
- Also, in registered cooperatives, governments has unnecessary power over their creation, whereas in registered comcom, as being a normal company, the value of the damage done by breaking the contract is recognizable and
- all cases of "transferring ownership", such as in the case of "the change for america", are impossible.
- Also and because the mobility in the exit, when 2 comcomized units are clashed ans since the members can move to the better one, such clashes tends to end faster and more peacefully.
- Also, in registered cooperatives, governments has unnecessary power over their creation, whereas in registered comcom, as being a normal company, the value of the damage done by breaking the contract is recognizable and
Very Generally speaking
- Compared with the co-op structuring being more hermetic, the ComComism allows a check and balance by the existing and optional peers over the executive power of their unit, by constantly being able to influence or check the performances over a constant given time of such executives, as such performances are reflected in the lowest, the average and the highest share price and may be estimated through both numbers: of the transactions and of the (peer and/or ordinary) owners in any specific unit, (where the ratio of transactions to owners could help in estimating the reliability of such reflection); and
- the normal recommended flow of ownership
- goes from the many individuals making, as peers and among themselves, a personal agreement of ownership over "something", which is optionally expandable for including other things, or strating in owning a club, through many clubs owning limited company, to the many limited companies owning public companies and
- splits as the ordinary owners are the providers for the peers, such providers as
- contributes,
- employees,
- contractor or
- comcom/companies.
| Personal agreement e.g. by a click for ownership over a site by its members. | Club If d=1, then the legal form of the comcom can easily be established as a club (social, political, buying club or users' group etc), but only as any member can sell her/his own (fees for) membership at any price while caring (via representatives) for updating the "reflective value of the club" to match the price made in that transaction. Such price and/or such "reflective value of the club" can be in a nominal value stated in points as the club believe each point to correlate with currency e.g. as 1 point correlates to $2.345. | Limited company | Public company | |
| Scale | smallest | smaller and simpler | bigger and more difficult | biggest |
| Enforcement such of tax and attached value to claims | least | less | more | most |
Some links:
| @A@The Personal Agreement Of Ownership Establishing Comcom . | @W@4 levels low cost Workshops And Trainings for Comcomism | @M@Comcomized Mailing Services- the basic Internet platform for comcomism, renting services for mailing list of which members are its owners, implementing real time and active ownership. |
| @DOInvest As A Peer-owner Instead Of Donate | @IS The 55-structuring | @OM ComCom-Community |
| @GO Govcomcom demand your government to list those who are to be reword by its privatization or its bailout and then take those in the list to become peer owners in a comcom of which your government took share or should have been taking shares. | @SB Comcomism For Small Businesses | @CS Comcom Social - Social Networking with more of ownership of ts members - less of donation and in a constant start-up's mood |
| Secure data storage by the SDP | ||
| interview (5) on youtube | cycle-it | |
|---|---|---|
| @O@ Comcomism - the organizations (comcomism Org) for establishing Scomcom of (d=1, 20<=c<=100) becoming holders in ComComIsm LTD ! | @I@Invest in one of the N Comcom Organizations which are P-Holders In the Comcomism Ltd | @C@the Comcomism Ltd |
| peer-owners The Book | ||
| Do something | Earn from it! | |
| Low Cost Workshops | ||
- peer-owners-your-net
- The World Is Now Changing
- Europa-flyer.pdf
- 99occupy: Decentralized, global and "comcomized" (equally owned by its users) platforms for the 99%
- comcomize by/for the occupy movements
- manual
- calendar for the comcomism connect
- fight bailout
- The full guidance for the agreements used for comcomized units
- do something, If you like it.
…also, read this image some images here and here
What forming the contract should include?
The contract (an example) shall define the following:
- the company, such as the company is defined by the will of its owners in the legal frame of the current country. (i.e. this agreement is under laws of what country/ies?);
- its goals, such as providing improvement of conditions of it owners. As for the issue of taxation, the project is part of bigger one aiming to create a new market, where the exact conditions for and of that market, as the project is to be developed organically, are to be decided by the new shareholders still to be recruited;
- its structuring (above 6 points); and
- the rights and duties of its owners: Paragraphs 14-17 from here;
- acceptable equivalences to money in exchange for ownership, such as in notes (of measurements for qualities of things), in hours or effort of spending or in goods such as of content etc;
- additional limitation of liability ; and
- start value - does it have a starting money/assets?
See some more images here
An Important note:
The Following is an old and historical documentation on the issue and should be considered obsolete in any contradiction in relation with the above.
| Next--> | 1) latest comments | 2) short descriptions | 3) ComCom in wider context | 4) definition | 5) comparison | 5) distribution of powers | 7) using this doc | 8) unique factors | |||
| Join here for becoming one of the first 5500 ComComists initiating worldwide the comcomism (see here how we do it and here see why) | |||||||||||
Here you can learn the Why and the For-what but please also try the Howto and the What and do not miss our latest-comments.
Now, decentralising human systems is in your hands, also in the commercial world and in parallel to the political change we already observe. You don't need to fight, flatter and/or be ranked against the Huge ones even as they gain their power by lobbies, when you can simply neutralize them.
So, how can you still own what you (must for your own profit) share we are to answer in this page also in respect to the free-software/open-source movements, which do solve the knowledge aspect of distribution but never the over-centralised (capitalistic and/or governmental) power attached with such knowledge. (and now just think of the trend of social networking involving developed applications in their platform)
Please do not forget to go to this page to see the exact price for such privilege and/or for learn how to become a Common shareholder in IsWith LTD: The first to promote and become a ComCom.
Here we begin with a strong belief that it is a good thing for any one to interface with ComCom (and that this is the main choice to make for any one at least as client if not also as an artist developer and/or a researcher - aka power producers).
- Introduction (ComCom Social why),
- Geting Into IsWith - the HowTo (This is how we do it),
- ComCom - Common Company and Common Companies
- Introduction to Common Companies - the ComCom
- ComCom - Just for to grasp it
- ComCom - 7 Short Descriptions (node/38),
- ComCom - How it goes for me being a power producer (node/12)
- ComCom in the evolution of the Web: Web1.0, Web2.0 and Web3.0 - How to make money from even small social networking (node/40),
- ComCom - In 6 points fully defined (node/13)
- ComCom - Its Condition, one Example and some notes
- ComCom - Its Unique factors: the d, c and policy
- Comparison: ComCom vs Private companies
- ComCom - Is it open source or close source oriented?
- For whom is the knowledge making profit ? in 1 table (node/18)
- Distribution of powers:the power producers,owners and holders (node/31)
- The focus, the dream and the problem of centralized systems in which we are living (node/19)
- ComCom - in its wider context: (still) Own what You share, as bigger is the d and in addition to the have, the want and the can
- The IsWith: The company in London, its business and its networking,
- ComCom Social Networking in general and in practice (recommend almost anyone - to be its founder, to initiate it and/or to share, to own and use it)
- The News, Links, Forum, RSS, Todo etc
- This site & the HowTo use this page
- unfold-all
gtgl (Good Time Good Luck) from namzezam
By namzezam, on 24 May 2007 22:28 history Tags:
~~Page's End!~~ Ignore ads by installing ublock.